In September 2011, the President of Palau made a statement to the UN General Assembly in which he asked the General Assembly to “seek, on an urgent basis… an advisory opinion from the International Court of Justice on the responsibilities of States under international law to ensure that activities carried out under their jurisdiction or control that emit greenhouse gases do not damage other States”. The United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC) is the principal international legal instrument adopted by States to address climate change. In addition to its substantive provisions, it also includes procedures for the settlement of disputes between States parties. Given its scope and procedures, therefore, the UNFCCC could be viewed as establishing a ‘special regime’ which derogates from general international law and prevents parties to the Convention from seeking legal redress for the adverse effects of global warming outside of the Convention process. This paper analyses whether such contentions are warranted.
31 January 2013
All reasonable efforts have been made to ensure the accuracy of this information at the time the advice was produced (please refer to the date produced below). However, the materials have been prepared for informational purposes only and may have been superseded by more recent developments. They do not constitute formal legal advice or create a lawyer-client relationship. You should seek legal advice to take account of your own interests. To the extent permitted any liability is excluded. Those consulting the database may wish to contact LRI for clarifications and an updated analysis.
Explore similar content
Enforceability of US NDC in US courts
What legal standing does the US INDC/NDC, and in particular the overall economy-wide target of reducing its greenhouse gas emissions by 26%-...
24 January 2017
Levy on Carbon Majors to pay for Loss and Damage
Does the mandate of other international fora, in particular the WTO, limit the competence of the UNFCCC to review and possibly decide on mea...
27 March 2015
Legal bindingness of "Nationally determined contributions"
1. Are there examples of international agreements that "meld not legally binding at the international level with an approach that emphasizes...
4 April 2014